IWPvsVO

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF or Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 24% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 81 stocks in both. VO costs 0.03% a year against 0.23% for IWP, $20 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWP returned +6.0% and VO +16.8%.

24%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWP58% in stocks the other holds too
VO30% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWPVOYearly cost0.23%0.03%Net assets$21.6B$224.1BPositions270295Last 12 months+6.0%+16.8%3 years, a year+15.4%+15.3%5 years, a year+5.8%+7.9%Largest holdingBlackRock 3.8%VRT 1.2%Main sectorTechnology 32%Industrials 20%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWP$213VO$215
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWP: June 2026, VO: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.