IWPvsIWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF or iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 34% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 262 stocks in both. IWR costs 0.18% a year against 0.23% for IWP, $5 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWP returned +6.0% and IWR +21.5%.

34%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWP99% in stocks the other holds too
IWR40% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWPIWRYearly cost0.23%0.18%Net assets$21.6B$57.0BPositions270830Last 12 months+6.0%+21.5%3 years, a year+15.4%+16.3%5 years, a year+5.8%+8.3%Largest holdingBlackRock 3.8%BlackRock 2.6%Main sectorTechnology 32%Industrials 18%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWP$213IWR$218
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWP: June 2026, IWR: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.