IWDvsSCHV

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF or Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 66% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 489 stocks in both. SCHV costs 0.04% a year against 0.18% for IWD, $14 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWD returned +26.9% and SCHV +27.8%.

66%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWD66% in stocks the other holds too
SCHV82% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWDSCHVYearly cost0.18%0.04%Net assets$79.7B$15.5BPositions873559Last 12 months+26.9%+27.8%3 years, a year+17.6%+19.4%5 years, a year+11.0%+10.3%Largest holdingAMZN 5.9%MU 3.5%Main sectorFinancial Services 19%Technology 21%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWD$220SCHV$217
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWD: June 2026, SCHV: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.