IWDvsRWL

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF or Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 56% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 418 stocks in both. IWD costs 0.18% a year against 0.39% for RWL, $21 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWD returned +26.9% and RWL +28.1%.

56%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWD89% in stocks the other holds too
RWL86% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWDRWLYearly cost0.18%0.39%Net assets$79.7B$9.1BPositions873504Last 12 months+26.9%+28.1%3 years, a year+17.6%+21.1%5 years, a year+11.0%+13.2%Largest holdingAMZN 5.9%AMZN 4.5%Main sectorFinancial Services 19%Healthcare 19%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWD$220RWL$271
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWD: June 2026, RWL: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.