IWBvsURTH

iShares Russell 1000 ETF or iShares MSCI World ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 71% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 526 stocks in both. IWB costs 0.15% a year against 0.24% for URTH, $9 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWB returned +21.9% and URTH +27.6%.

71%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWB93% in stocks the other holds too
URTH72% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWBURTHYearly cost0.15%0.24%Net assets$48.3B$8.1BPositions1,0281,329Last 12 months+21.9%+27.6%3 years, a year+20.3%+22.0%5 years, a year+12.5%+12.1%Largest holdingNVDA 6.7%NVDA 5.6%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 28%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWB$279URTH$254
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWB: June 2026, URTH: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.