IWBvsPRF

iShares Russell 1000 ETF or Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 64% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 764 stocks in both. IWB costs 0.15% a year against 0.34% for PRF, $19 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWB returned +21.9% and PRF +30.4%.

64%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWB93% in stocks the other holds too
PRF95% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWBPRFYearly cost0.15%0.34%Net assets$48.3B$9.8BPositions1,0281,003Last 12 months+21.9%+30.4%3 years, a year+20.3%+19.3%5 years, a year+12.5%+13.3%Largest holdingNVDA 6.7%AAPL 4.3%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 20%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWB$272PRF$262
August 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWB: June 2026, PRF: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.