IUSGvsXLG

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF or Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 71% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 35 stocks in both. IUSG costs 0.04% a year against 0.20% for XLG, $16 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IUSG returned +25.9% and XLG +13.5%.

71%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IUSG78% in stocks the other holds too
XLG87% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IUSGXLGYearly cost0.04%0.20%Net assets$32.2B$10.6BPositions39552Last 12 months+25.9%+13.5%3 years, a year+25.4%+19.8%5 years, a year+14.2%+13.7%Largest holdingNVDA 13.0%NVDA 12.1%Main sectorTechnology 51%Technology 49%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IUSG$317XLG$310
August 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IUSG: June 2026, XLG: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.