IJKvsSCHM

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF or Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 35% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 180 stocks in both. SCHM costs 0.03% a year against 0.17% for IJK, $14 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IJK returned +29.8% and SCHM +32.5%.

35%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IJK80% in stocks the other holds too
SCHM35% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IJKSCHMYearly cost0.17%0.03%Net assets$11.3B$14.6BPositions248499Last 12 months+29.8%+32.5%3 years, a year+17.1%+19.1%5 years, a year+8.7%+7.9%Largest holdingBlackRock 5.9%SNDK 4.6%Main sectorIndustrials 30%Technology 22%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IJK$218SCHM$211
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IJK: June 2026, SCHM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.