SCHMvsVBR

Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF or Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 47% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 285 stocks in both. SCHM costs 0.03% a year against 0.05% for VBR, $2 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months SCHM returned +32.5% and VBR +27.0%.

47%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
SCHM50% in stocks the other holds too
VBR55% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

SCHMVBRYearly cost0.03%0.05%Net assets$14.6B$67.8BPositions499845Last 12 months+32.5%+27.0%3 years, a year+19.1%+16.1%5 years, a year+7.9%+9.2%Largest holdingSNDK 4.6%Vanguard 0.9%Main sectorTechnology 22%Industrials 17%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

SCHM$211VBR$217
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (SCHM: May 2026, VBR: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.