IGMvsQYLD

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF or Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 67% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 44 stocks in both. IGM costs 0.39% a year against 0.60% for QYLD, $21 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IGM returned +45.9% and QYLD +19.5%.

67%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IGM82% in stocks the other holds too
QYLD68% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IGMQYLDYearly cost0.39%0.60%Net assets$10.7B$8.1BPositions300104Last 12 months+45.9%+19.5%3 years, a year+36.1%+12.3%5 years, a year+19.8%+7.8%Largest holdingNVDA 8.0%NVDA 8.2%Main sectorTechnology 85%Technology 57%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IGM$451QYLD$175
August 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IGM: June 2026, QYLD: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.