IEFAvsVT

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF or Vanguard Total World Stock ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 2.2% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 50 stocks in both. VT costs 0.06% a year against 0.07% for IEFA, $1 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IEFA returned +24.8% and VT +22.3%.

2.2%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IEFA9.3% in stocks the other holds too
VT2.4% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IEFAVTYearly cost0.07%0.06%Net assets$190.1B$97.9BPositions2,63210,100Last 12 months+24.8%+22.3%3 years, a year+16.1%+18.0%5 years, a year+8.9%+10.6%Largest holdingASML 2.5%NVDA 4.1%Main sectorn/aTechnology 22%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IEFA$200VT$239
August 2019July 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IEFA: July 2026, VT: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.