FTECvsQYLD

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF or Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 53% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 39 stocks in both. FTEC costs 0.08% a year against 0.60% for QYLD, $52 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months FTEC returned +32.1% and QYLD +19.5%.

53%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
FTEC77% in stocks the other holds too
QYLD57% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

FTECQYLDYearly cost0.08%0.60%Net assets$19.9B$8.1BPositions284104Last 12 months+32.1%+19.5%3 years, a year+26.9%+12.3%5 years, a year+18.1%+7.8%Largest holdingNVDA 17.1%NVDA 8.2%Main sectorTechnology 99%Technology 57%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

FTEC$442QYLD$178
August 2019July 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (FTEC: July 2026, QYLD: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.