DFACvsIWB

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF or iShares Russell 1000 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 70% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 879 stocks in both. IWB costs 0.15% a year against 0.17% for DFAC, $2 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months DFAC returned +22.6% and IWB +21.9%.

70%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
DFAC88% in stocks the other holds too
IWB96% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

DFACIWBYearly cost0.17%0.15%Net assets$47.9B$48.3BPositions2,5541,028Last 12 months+22.6%+21.9%3 years, a year+17.7%+20.3%5 years, a year+11.8%+12.5%Largest holdingNVDA 5.3%NVDA 6.7%Main sectorTechnology 28%Technology 36%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from May 2021, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

DFAC$180IWB$186
May 2021June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (DFAC: July 2026, IWB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.