MRSH vs WTW
Marsh McLennan and Willis Towers Watson, both Financial Services
Marsh McLennan is the larger company at $100B against $31B. On trailing earnings WTW is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 20.7 against 25.1, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MRSH returned +18% against +6.7% for WTW. The RyuScore puts MRSH ahead, 68 against 57 out of 100.
| Figure | MRSH | Both figures drawn to one scale | WTW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last close | $209 | $337 | |
| Market cap | $100B | $31B | |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 25.1 | 20.7 | |
| Dividend yield | 1.8% | 1.1% | |
| Revenue growthlast twelve months on the year before | +7.6% | +4.8% | |
| Insiders, 12 monthsopen-market Form 4 trades | sold $16M net | bought $911483 net | |
| Short interestof shares outstanding | 1.4% | 2.4% | |
| 1-year return | +18% | +6.7% | |
| 5-year return | +32% | +44% | |
| RyuScore0 to 100 | 68/100 | 57/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Marsh McLennan
Revenue of $6.9B in the quarter to Sep 30, 2026, net income $808M. Its largest reported line is Wealth, 46% of the disclosed total.
Willis Towers Watson
Revenue of $2.5B in the quarter to Sep 30, 2026, net income $303M. Its largest reported line is Rest Of World, 29% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.