ERIE vs MRSH

Erie Indemnity and Marsh McLennan, both Financial Services

Marsh McLennan is the larger company at $100B against $13B. On trailing earnings ERIE is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 23.1 against 25.1, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MRSH returned +18% against -4.3% for ERIE. The RyuScore puts ERIE ahead, 81 against 68 out of 100.

Erie Indemnity and Marsh McLennan compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureERIEMRSH
Last close$286$209
Market cap$13B$100B
Trailing P/E23.125.1
Dividend yieldn/a1.8%
Revenue growth+2.0%+7.6%
Insiders, 12 monthssold $100952 netsold $16M net
Short interest5.3%1.4%
1-year return-4.3%+18%
5-year return+53%+32%
RyuScore81/10068/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Erie Indemnity

Revenue of $1.1B in the quarter to Sep 30, 2026, net income $182M. Its largest reported line is Policy Issuanceand Renewal Services, 79% of the disclosed total.

Marsh McLennan

Revenue of $6.9B in the quarter to Sep 30, 2026, net income $808M. Its largest reported line is Wealth, 46% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.