CMI vs GEV
Cummins and GE Vernova, both Industrials
GE Vernova is the larger company at $298B against $99B. On trailing earnings CMI is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 26.7 against 28.8, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year GEV returned +65% against +24% for CMI. The RyuScore puts CMI ahead, 71 against 49 out of 100.
| Figure | CMI | GEV |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $523 | $1005 |
| Market cap | $99B | $298B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 26.7 | 28.8 |
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| 1-year return | +24% | +65% |
| 5-year return | +148% | n/a |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 71/100 | 49/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cummins
Revenue of $9.5B in Q2 2026, net income $968M. Its largest reported line is DBU Power Generation, 16% of the disclosed total.
GE Vernova
Revenue of $11B in Q2 2026, net income $668M. Its largest reported line is Power, 55% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.