CMI vs GEV
Cummins and GE Vernova, both Industrials
GE Vernova is the larger company at $298B against $99B. On trailing earnings GEV is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 27.4 against 29.6, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CMI returned +54% against +44% for GEV. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts GEV ahead, 10/10 against 6/10.
| Figure | CMI | GEV |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $578 | $954 |
| Market cap | $99B | $298B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 29.6 | 27.4 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 0.1% |
| 1-year return | +54% | +44% |
| 5-year return | +180% | n/a |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cummins
Revenue of $9.5B in Q2 2026, net income $968M. Its largest reported line is DBU Power Generation, 15% of the disclosed total.
GE Vernova
Revenue of $11B in Q2 2026, net income $668M. Its largest reported line is Power, 55% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.