CMI vs ETN
Cummins and Eaton Corporation, both Industrials
Eaton Corporation is the larger company at $164B against $99B. On trailing earnings CMI is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 29.6 against 42.7, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CMI returned +54% against +19% for ETN. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts ETN ahead, 7/10 against 6/10.
| Figure | CMI | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $578 | $420 |
| Market cap | $99B | $164B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 29.6 | 42.7 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| 1-year return | +54% | +19% |
| 5-year return | +180% | +187% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cummins
Revenue of $9.5B in Q2 2026, net income $968M. Its largest reported line is DBU Power Generation, 15% of the disclosed total.
Eaton Corporation
Revenue of $8.5B in Q2 2026, net income $821M. Its largest reported line is Electrical Global, 42% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.