CMI vs EMR
Cummins and Emerson Electric, both Industrials
Cummins is the larger company at $99B against $84B. On trailing earnings CMI is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 26.7 against 35.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year EMR returned +24% against +24% for CMI. The RyuScore puts CMI ahead, 71 against 51 out of 100.
| Figure | CMI | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $523 | $162 |
| Market cap | $99B | $84B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 26.7 | 35.4 |
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| 1-year return | +24% | +24% |
| 5-year return | +148% | +80% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 71/100 | 51/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cummins
Revenue of $9.5B in Q2 2026, net income $968M. Its largest reported line is DBU Power Generation, 16% of the disclosed total.
Emerson Electric
Revenue of $4.9B in Q3 2026, net income $718M. Its largest reported line is Final Control, 33% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.