CMI vs EMR
Cummins and Emerson Electric, both Industrials
Cummins is the larger company at $99B against $84B. On trailing earnings CMI is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 29.6 against 34.6, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CMI returned +54% against +20% for EMR. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts CMI ahead, 6/10 against 5/10.
| Figure | CMI | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $578 | $158 |
| Market cap | $99B | $84B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 29.6 | 34.6 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| 1-year return | +54% | +20% |
| 5-year return | +180% | +73% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cummins
Revenue of $9.5B in Q2 2026, net income $968M. Its largest reported line is DBU Power Generation, 15% of the disclosed total.
Emerson Electric
Revenue of $4.9B in Q3 2026, net income $718M. Its largest reported line is Final Control, 33% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.