CLS vs JBL
Celestica Inc. and Jabil, both Technology
Celestica Inc. is the larger company at $42B against $39B. On trailing earnings CLS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 37.7 against 38.3, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CLS returned +43% against +37% for JBL. The RyuScore puts JBL ahead, 74 against 71 out of 100.
| Figure | CLS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $362 | $306 |
| Market cap | $42B | $39B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 37.7 | 38.3 |
| 1-year return | +43% | +37% |
| 5-year return | +4100% | +395% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 71/100 | 74/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Celestica Inc.
Revenue of $4.7B in Q2 2026, net income $369M. Its largest reported line is CCS, 75% of the disclosed total.
Jabil
Revenue of $8.8B in Q3 2026, net income $275M. Its largest reported line is Intelligent Infrastructure, 76% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.