CLS vs FN
Celestica Inc. and Fabrinet, both Technology
Celestica Inc. is the larger company at $42B against $20B. On trailing earnings FN is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 37.3 against 37.7, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CLS returned +43% against +27% for FN. The RyuScore puts CLS ahead, 71 against 66 out of 100.
| Figure | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $362 | $486 |
| Market cap | $42B | $20B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 37.7 | 37.3 |
| 1-year return | +43% | +27% |
| 5-year return | +4100% | +358% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 71/100 | 66/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Celestica Inc.
Revenue of $4.7B in Q2 2026, net income $369M. Its largest reported line is CCS, 75% of the disclosed total.
Fabrinet
Revenue of $1.3B in Q4 2026, net income $139M. Its largest reported line is Thailand, 91% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.