CLS vs GLW
Celestica Inc. and Corning Inc., both Technology
Corning Inc. is the larger company at $168B against $42B. On trailing earnings CLS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 37.7 against 71.5, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year GLW returned +98% against +43% for CLS. The RyuScore puts CLS ahead, 71 against 36 out of 100.
| Figure | CLS | GLW |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $362 | $157 |
| Market cap | $42B | $168B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 37.7 | 71.5 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 0.7% |
| 1-year return | +43% | +98% |
| 5-year return | +4100% | +355% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 71/100 | 36/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Celestica Inc.
Revenue of $4.7B in Q2 2026, net income $369M. Its largest reported line is CCS, 75% of the disclosed total.
Corning Inc.
Revenue of $4.5B in Q2 2026, net income $559M. Its largest reported line is Optical Communications Products, 46% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.