CELH vs FIZZ

Celsius Holdings, Inc. and National Beverage Corp., both Consumer Defensive

Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger company at $7.9B against $3.4B. On trailing earnings FIZZ is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 16.8 against 83.9, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year FIZZ returned -29% against -30% for CELH. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts FIZZ ahead, 8/10 against 6/10.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. and National Beverage Corp.compared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureCELHFIZZ
Last close$35.22$32.97
Market cap$7.9B$3.4B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better83.916.8
1-year return-30%-29%
5-year return+53%-18%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–106/108/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

Revenue of $783M in Q1 2026, net income $110M. Its largest reported line is North America, 95% of the disclosed total.

National Beverage Corp.

Revenue of $297M in Q4 2026, net income $40M.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.