TSCOTractor Supply
Is it safe?
Strong, no red flags: a safe balance sheet, insiders buying, and comfortable debt (AA).
Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Mixed fundamental signals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Multiple insiders bought with their own money (net +$652K, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026).
Rock-solid balance sheet, low leverage. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -53% · now 43% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Dec 27, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can TSCO take a bad year?
Tractor Supply carries $1.92B of net debt at 1.04× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q2 2026 · under two and a half years of EBITDA, comfortable
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 1.04×
Net debt / EBITDA · 0.74× a year ago · the load is going up
- Altman Z-score
- 4.06
Altman Z-score · safe zone, above 3
- Debt / equity
- 0.82×
Debt / equity
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $2.15B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $232M
- Net debt
- $1.92B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $1.85B
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $1.34B
- Debt / equity
- 0.82×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 1.16×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 30%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −53%
- Below its 52-week high
- 43%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Specialty Retail
The closest names by size in the same industry