REGRegency Centers
Is it safe?
Nothing alarming, nothing pristine: comfortable debt (A) and steady price behavior.
Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Relatively steady, low volatility. Worst drawdown -57% · now 13% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can REG take a bad year?
Regency Centers carries $4.86B of net debt at 3.11× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q1 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 3.11×
Net debt / EBITDA · 3.14× a year ago · the load is coming down
- Debt / equity
- 0.73×
Debt / equity
- Annualised volatility
- 18%
Annualised volatility · about as steady as the market itself
Details›
- Total debtQ1 2026
- $5.00B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $146M
- Net debt
- $4.86B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $1.56B
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $1.15B
- Debt / equity
- 0.73×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 3.21×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 18%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −57%
- Below its 52-week high
- 13%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
REIT, Retail
The closest names by size in the same industry