VBvsXMMO

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF or Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 12% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 72 stocks in both. VB costs 0.03% a year against 0.35% for XMMO, $32 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months VB returned +29.5% and XMMO +18.9%.

12%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
VB12% in stocks the other holds too
XMMO97% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

VBXMMOYearly cost0.03%0.35%Net assets$188.7B$7.2BPositions1,31778Last 12 months+29.5%+18.9%3 years, a year+16.7%+23.8%5 years, a year+7.7%+13.4%Largest holdingVanguard 1.7%Invesco 5.3%Main sectorIndustrials 20%Industrials 43%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

VB$211XMMO$304
August 2019June 2026

Only in XMMO

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. ALVAutoliv, Inc.0.6%

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (VB: June 2026, XMMO: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.