URTHvsVT

iShares MSCI World ETF or Vanguard Total World Stock ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 60% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 604 stocks in both. VT costs 0.06% a year against 0.24% for URTH, $18 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months URTH returned +27.6% and VT +22.3%.

60%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
URTH77% in stocks the other holds too
VT60% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

URTHVTYearly cost0.24%0.06%Net assets$8.1B$97.9BPositions1,32910,100Last 12 months+27.6%+22.3%3 years, a year+22.0%+18.0%5 years, a year+12.1%+10.6%Largest holdingNVDA 5.6%NVDA 4.1%Main sectorTechnology 28%Technology 22%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

URTH$254VT$246
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (URTH: May 2026, VT: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.