PRFvsRSP

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF or Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 47% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 479 stocks in both. RSP costs 0.20% a year against 0.34% for PRF, $14 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months PRF returned +30.4% and RSP +19.3%.

47%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
PRF88% in stocks the other holds too
RSP96% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

PRFRSPYearly cost0.34%0.20%Net assets$9.8B$96.5BPositions1,003508Last 12 months+30.4%+19.3%3 years, a year+19.3%+13.5%5 years, a year+13.3%+8.9%Largest holdingAAPL 4.3%Invesco 3.1%Main sectorTechnology 20%Industrials 16%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

PRF$266RSP$224
August 2019July 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (PRF: July 2026, RSP: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.