MGVvsVHT

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF or Vanguard Health Care ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 16% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 19 stocks in both. MGV costs 0.05% a year against 0.09% for VHT, $4 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months MGV returned +26.8% and VHT +16.7%.

16%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
MGV16% in stocks the other holds too
VHT52% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

MGVVHTYearly cost0.05%0.09%Net assets$12.7B$19.0BPositions129407Last 12 months+26.8%+16.7%3 years, a year+19.6%+7.5%5 years, a year+12.0%+4.6%Largest holdingMU 5.3%LLY 14.0%Main sectorFinancial Services 22%Healthcare 99%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

MGV$236VHT$182
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (MGV: May 2026, VHT: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.