IWSvsSCHM

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF or Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 35% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 371 stocks in both. SCHM costs 0.03% a year against 0.23% for IWS, $20 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWS returned +26.4% and SCHM +32.5%.

35%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWS35% in stocks the other holds too
SCHM72% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWSSCHMYearly cost0.23%0.03%Net assets$15.6B$14.6BPositions724499Last 12 months+26.4%+32.5%3 years, a year+16.3%+19.1%5 years, a year+9.3%+7.9%Largest holdingBlackrock 1.8%SNDK 4.6%Main sectorFinancial Services 17%Technology 22%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWS$209SCHM$211
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWS: June 2026, SCHM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.