IWRvsSCHM

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF or Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 33% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 411 stocks in both. SCHM costs 0.03% a year against 0.18% for IWR, $15 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWR returned +21.5% and SCHM +32.5%.

33%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWR33% in stocks the other holds too
SCHM83% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWRSCHMYearly cost0.18%0.03%Net assets$57.0B$14.6BPositions830499Last 12 months+21.5%+32.5%3 years, a year+16.3%+19.1%5 years, a year+8.3%+7.9%Largest holdingBlackRock 2.6%SNDK 4.6%Main sectorIndustrials 18%Technology 22%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWR$214SCHM$211
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWR: June 2026, SCHM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.