IWNvsSCHH

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF or Schwab U.S. REIT ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 5.9% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 37 stocks in both. SCHH costs 0.07% a year against 0.24% for IWN, $17 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWN returned +42.7% and SCHH +13.6%.

5.9%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWN5.9% in stocks the other holds too
SCHH6.7% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWNSCHHYearly cost0.24%0.07%Net assets$14.5B$10.0BPositions1,426119Last 12 months+42.7%+13.6%3 years, a year+18.4%+11.3%5 years, a year+8.0%+3.9%Largest holdingBlackRock 5.2%WELL 9.6%Main sectorFinancial Services 26%Real Estate 90%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWN$213SCHH$123
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWN: June 2026, SCHH: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.