IEMGvsVB

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF or Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. They hold no stocks in common. VB costs 0.03% a year against 0.09% for IEMG, $6 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IEMG returned +51.6% and VB +29.5%.

0.0%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IEMG0.0% in stocks the other holds too
VB0.1% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IEMGVBYearly cost0.09%0.03%Net assets$162.0B$188.7BPositions2,7001,317Last 12 months+51.6%+29.5%3 years, a year+24.2%+16.7%5 years, a year+7.8%+7.7%Largest holdingTaiwan 12.5%Vanguard 1.7%Main sectorn/aIndustrials 20%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IEMG$208VB$213
September 2019May 2026

What they both hold

1 stocks are in both funds: 0.0% of IEMG and 0.1% of VB. The biggest shared positions:

Stockin IEMGin VB
SM0.0%0.1%

Only in IEMG

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. AUAngloGold Ashanti plc0.3%
  2. NUNu Holdings Ltd.0.3%
  3. BAPCredicorp Ltd.0.2%
  4. SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation0.1%
  5. YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.0.1%
  6. XPXP Inc.0.0%

Only in VB

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.5%
  2. JBLJabil0.5%
  3. RVMDRevolution Medicines, Inc.0.5%
  4. ALABAstera Labs, Inc.0.5%
  5. NTRANatera, Inc.0.4%
  6. EMEEmcor0.4%

More comparisons

VB vs VXFVB vs VBRSCHM vs VBDFAS vs VBVB vs VBK

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IEMG: May 2026, VB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.