FNDAvsVB

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF or Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 34% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 595 stocks in both. VB costs 0.03% a year against 0.25% for FNDA, $22 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months FNDA returned +32.2% and VB +29.5%.

34%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
FNDA71% in stocks the other holds too
VB40% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

FNDAVBYearly cost0.25%0.03%Net assets$8.9B$188.7BPositions9331,317Last 12 months+32.2%+29.5%3 years, a year+17.7%+16.7%5 years, a year+7.4%+7.7%Largest holdingState 1.1%Vanguard 1.7%Main sectorIndustrials 19%Industrials 20%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

FNDA$218VB$213
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (FNDA: May 2026, VB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.