DFATvsIWN

Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF or iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 37% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 632 stocks in both. IWN costs 0.24% a year against 0.28% for DFAT, $4 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months DFAT returned +32.1% and IWN +42.7%.

37%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
DFAT40% in stocks the other holds too
IWN60% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

DFATIWNYearly cost0.28%0.24%Net assets$14.5B$14.5BPositions1,2111,426Last 12 months+32.1%+42.7%3 years, a year+14.2%+18.4%5 years, a year+11.5%+8.0%Largest holdingDimensional 4.1%BlackRock 5.2%Main sectorFinancial Services 28%Financial Services 26%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from May 2021, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

DFAT$168IWN$150
May 2021June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (DFAT: July 2026, IWN: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.