CGUSvsSCHG

Capital Group Core Equity ETF or Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 47% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 24 stocks in both. SCHG costs 0.04% a year against 0.33% for CGUS, $29 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months CGUS returned +27.3% and SCHG +27.9%.

47%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
CGUS55% in stocks the other holds too
SCHG66% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

CGUSSCHGYearly cost0.33%0.04%Net assets$10.8B$61.1BPositions66197Last 12 months+27.3%+27.9%3 years, a year+23.4%+26.6%5 years, a yearn/a+15.9%Largest holdingNVDA 6.8%NVDA 11.0%Main sectorTechnology 37%Technology 47%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from February 2022, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

CGUS$188SCHG$192
February 2022May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (CGUS: May 2026, SCHG: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.