CGDVvsXLB

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF or State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 5.5% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 4 stocks in both. XLB costs 0.08% a year against 0.33% for CGDV, $25 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months CGDV returned +32.5% and XLB +17.9%.

5.5%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
CGDV5.5% in stocks the other holds too
XLB25% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

CGDVXLBYearly cost0.33%0.08%Net assets$35.2B$8.2BPositions5331Last 12 months+32.5%+17.9%3 years, a year+26.0%+9.1%5 years, a yearn/a+6.4%Largest holdingMSFT 5.8%LIN 14.1%Main sectorTechnology 34%Basic Materials 100%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from February 2022, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

CGDV$209XLB$132
February 2022May 2026

What they both hold

4 stocks are in both funds: 5.5% of CGDV and 25% of XLB. The biggest shared positions:

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (CGDV: May 2026, XLB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.