ACWIvsURTH

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF or iShares MSCI World ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 67% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 587 stocks in both. URTH costs 0.24% a year against 0.32% for ACWI, $8 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months ACWI returned +22.2% and URTH +27.6%.

67%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
ACWI67% in stocks the other holds too
URTH77% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

ACWIURTHYearly cost0.32%0.24%Net assets$32.5B$8.1BPositions2,2731,329Last 12 months+22.2%+27.6%3 years, a year+18.3%+22.0%5 years, a year+10.9%+12.1%Largest holdingNVDA 4.6%NVDA 5.6%Main sectorTechnology 23%Technology 28%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

ACWI$247URTH$254
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (ACWI: July 2026, URTH: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.