MU vs NVDA
Micron Technology and NVIDIA Corporation, both Technology
NVIDIA Corporation is the larger company at $5.2T against $1.3T. On trailing earnings MU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 23.3 against 29.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MU returned +510% against +30% for NVDA. The RyuScore puts NVDA ahead, 69 against 56 out of 100.
| Figure | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $1029 | $229 |
| Market cap | $1.3T | $5.2T |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 23.3 | 29.0 |
| 1-year return | +510% | +30% |
| 5-year return | +1319% | +939% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 56/100 | 69/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Micron Technology
Revenue of $41B in Q3 2026, net income $28B. Its largest reported line is CMBU, 33% of the disclosed total.
NVIDIA Corporation
Revenue of $96B in Q2 2027, net income $60B. Its largest reported line is Hyperscale, 51% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.