LULU vs URBN
Lululemon Athletica and Urban Outfitters, Inc., both Consumer Cyclical
Lululemon Athletica is the larger company at $13B against $6.5B. On trailing earnings LULU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 9.4 against 15.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year URBN returned +2.9% against -41% for LULU.
| Figure | LULU | URBN |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $116 | $80.06 |
| Market cap | $13B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 9.4 | 15.4 |
| 1-year return | -41% | +2.9% |
| 5-year return | -71% | +118% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Lululemon Athletica
Revenue of $2.5B in Q1 2026, net income $195M. Its largest reported line is United States, 61% of the disclosed total.
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Revenue of $1.5B in Q1 2027, net income $116M. Its largest reported line is Apparel, 70% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.