LULU vs URBN

Lululemon Athletica and Urban Outfitters, Inc., both Consumer Cyclical

Lululemon Athletica is the larger company at $13B against $6.1B. On trailing earnings LULU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 7.8 against 12.8, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year URBN returned +15% against -44% for LULU. The RyuScore puts LULU ahead, 95 against 81 out of 100.

Lululemon Athletica and Urban Outfitters, Inc. compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureLULUURBN
Last close$94.50$82.19
Market cap$13B$6.1B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better7.812.8
1-year return-44%+15%
5-year return-78%+159%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1095/10081/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Lululemon Athletica

Revenue of $2.4B in Q2 2026, net income $329M. Its largest reported line is United States, 61% of the disclosed total.

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Revenue of $1.7B in Q2 2027, net income $241M. Its largest reported line is Apparel, 70% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.