BOOT vs LULU
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica, both Consumer Cyclical
Lululemon Athletica is the larger company at $13B against $5.3B. On trailing earnings LULU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 7.8 against 15.2, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year BOOT returned -32% against -44% for LULU. The RyuScore puts LULU ahead, 95 against 70 out of 100.
| Figure | BOOT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $120 | $94.50 |
| Market cap | $5.3B | $13B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 15.2 | 7.8 |
| 1-year return | -32% | -44% |
| 5-year return | +41% | -78% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 70/100 | 95/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
Revenue of $594M in Q1 2027, net income $70M.
Lululemon Athletica
Revenue of $2.4B in Q2 2026, net income $329M. Its largest reported line is United States, 61% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.