BOOT vs LULU
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica, both Consumer Cyclical
Lululemon Athletica is the larger company at $13B against $5.3B. On trailing earnings LULU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 9.4 against 21.7, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year BOOT returned -5.3% against -41% for LULU.
| Figure | BOOT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $160 | $116 |
| Market cap | $5.3B | $13B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 21.7 | 9.4 |
| 1-year return | -5.3% | -41% |
| 5-year return | +88% | -71% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
Revenue of $539M in Q4 2026, net income $44M.
Lululemon Athletica
Revenue of $2.5B in Q1 2026, net income $195M. Its largest reported line is United States, 61% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.