DXCM vs ZBH

Dexcom and Zimmer Biomet, both Healthcare

Dexcom is the larger company at $28B against $17B. On trailing earnings ZBH is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 21.6 against 33.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year DXCM returned +11% against -10% for ZBH. The RyuScore puts DXCM ahead, 73 against 68 out of 100.

Dexcom and Zimmer Biomet compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureDXCMZBH
Last close$84.10$89.12
Market cap$28B$17B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better33.421.6
Dividend yieldn/a1.1%
1-year return+11%-10%
5-year return-38%-32%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1073/10068/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Dexcom

Revenue of $1.3B in Q2 2026, net income $249M. Its largest reported line is United States, 81% of the disclosed total.

Zimmer Biomet

Revenue of $2.2B in Q2 2026, net income $198M. Its largest reported line is Knees, 38% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.