DXCM vs EW

Dexcom and Edwards Lifesciences, both Healthcare

Edwards Lifesciences is the larger company at $50B against $28B. On trailing earnings DXCM is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 33.4 against 49.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year EW returned +14% against +11% for DXCM. The RyuScore puts DXCM ahead, 73 against 60 out of 100.

Dexcom and Edwards Lifesciences compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureDXCMEW
Last close$84.10$85.20
Market cap$28B$50B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better33.449.0
1-year return+11%+14%
5-year return-38%-29%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1073/10060/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Dexcom

Revenue of $1.3B in Q2 2026, net income $249M. Its largest reported line is United States, 81% of the disclosed total.

Edwards Lifesciences

Revenue of $1.7B in Q2 2026, net income $241M. Its largest reported line is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, 72% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.