CUBE vs TRNO
CubeSmart and Terreno Realty Corporation, both Real Estate
CubeSmart is the larger company at $9.2B against $6.8B. On trailing earnings TRNO is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 16.5 against 28.3, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year TRNO returned +27% against +6.9% for CUBE. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts TRNO ahead, 6/10 against 5/10.
| Figure | CUBE | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $40.46 | $67.56 |
| Market cap | $9.2B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 28.3 | 16.5 |
| Dividend yield | 5.2% | 3.0% |
| 1-year return | +6.9% | +27% |
| 5-year return | +0.2% | +14% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
CubeSmart
Revenue of $282M in Q1 2026, net income $83M. Its largest reported line is Real Estate Other, 77% of the disclosed total.
Terreno Realty Corporation
Revenue of $124M in Q1 2026, net income $69M.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.