COR vs MCK

Cencora and McKesson Corporation, both Healthcare

McKesson Corporation is the larger company at $111B against $62B. On trailing earnings COR is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 24.1 against 25.6, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MCK returned +37% against +13% for COR. The RyuScore puts MCK ahead, 86 against 64 out of 100.

Cencora and McKesson Corporation compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureCORMCK
Last close$325$955
Market cap$62B$111B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better24.125.6
Dividend yield0.7%n/a
1-year return+13%+37%
5-year return+183%+380%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1064/10086/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Cencora

Revenue of $85B in Q3 2026, net income $764M. Its largest reported line is US Healthcare Solutions, 92% of the disclosed total.

McKesson Corporation

Revenue of $105B in Q1 2027, net income $614M. Its largest reported line is North American Pharmaceutical, 82% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.