COP vs FANG
ConocoPhillips and Diamondback Energy, both Energy
ConocoPhillips is the larger company at $131B against $52B. On trailing earnings COP is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 17.3 against 38.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year COP returned +45% against +42% for FANG. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts COP ahead, 4/10 against 2/10.
| Figure | COP | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $131 | $200 |
| Market cap | $131B | $52B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 17.3 | 38.0 |
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| 1-year return | +45% | +42% |
| 5-year return | +176% | +220% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
ConocoPhillips
Revenue of $19B in Q2 2026, net income $3.9B. Its largest reported line is US, 79% of the disclosed total.
Diamondback Energy
Revenue of $5.6B in Q2 2026, net income $1.9B. Its largest reported line is Oil Explorationand Production, 82% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.