COP vs FANG

ConocoPhillips and Diamondback Energy, both Energy

ConocoPhillips is the larger company at $131B against $52B. On trailing earnings COP is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 17.7 against 36.5, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year COP returned +47% against +39% for FANG. The RyuScore puts COP ahead, 85 against 48 out of 100.

ConocoPhillips and Diamondback Energy compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureCOPFANG
Last close$134$192
Market cap$131B$52B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better17.736.5
Dividend yield2.4%2.1%
1-year return+47%+39%
5-year return+176%+203%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1085/10048/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

ConocoPhillips

Revenue of $19B in Q2 2026, net income $3.9B. Its largest reported line is United States, 78% of the disclosed total.

Diamondback Energy

Revenue of $5.6B in Q2 2026, net income $1.9B. Its largest reported line is Oil Explorationand Production, 80% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.