CNQ vs COP
Canadian Natural Resources Limited and ConocoPhillips, both Energy
ConocoPhillips is the larger company at $131B against $86B. Over the past year CNQ returned +66% against +45% for COP. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts CNQ ahead, 9/10 against 4/10.
| Figure | CNQ | COP |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $49.66 | $131 |
| Market cap | $86B | $131B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | n/a | 17.3 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.4% |
| 1-year return | +66% | +45% |
| 5-year return | +290% | +176% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 9/10 | 4/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
ConocoPhillips
Revenue of $19B in Q2 2026, net income $3.9B. Its largest reported line is US, 79% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.