CNQ vs COP
Canadian Natural Resources Limited and ConocoPhillips, both Energy
ConocoPhillips is the larger company at $131B against $83B. Over the past year CNQ returned +60% against +47% for COP. The RyuScore puts COP ahead, 85 against 83 out of 100.
| Figure | CNQ | COP |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $49.65 | $134 |
| Market cap | $83B | $131B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | n/a | 17.7 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.4% |
| 1-year return | +60% | +47% |
| 5-year return | +273% | +176% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 83/100 | 85/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
ConocoPhillips
Revenue of $19B in Q2 2026, net income $3.9B. Its largest reported line is United States, 78% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.