CNQ vs FANG
Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Diamondback Energy, both Energy
Canadian Natural Resources Limited is the larger company at $83B against $52B. Over the past year CNQ returned +60% against +39% for FANG. The RyuScore puts CNQ ahead, 83 against 48 out of 100.
| Figure | CNQ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $49.65 | $192 |
| Market cap | $83B | $52B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | n/a | 36.5 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.1% |
| 1-year return | +60% | +39% |
| 5-year return | +273% | +203% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 83/100 | 48/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Diamondback Energy
Revenue of $5.6B in Q2 2026, net income $1.9B. Its largest reported line is Oil Explorationand Production, 80% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.