CNQ vs FANG
Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Diamondback Energy, both Energy
Canadian Natural Resources Limited is the larger company at $86B against $52B. Over the past year CNQ returned +66% against +42% for FANG. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts CNQ ahead, 9/10 against 2/10.
| Figure | CNQ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $49.66 | $200 |
| Market cap | $86B | $52B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | n/a | 38.0 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.0% |
| 1-year return | +66% | +42% |
| 5-year return | +290% | +220% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 9/10 | 2/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Diamondback Energy
Revenue of $5.6B in Q2 2026, net income $1.9B. Its largest reported line is Oil Explorationand Production, 82% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.