CDNS vs UBER
Cadence Design Systems and Uber
Uber is the larger company at $146B against $107B. On trailing earnings UBER is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 15.6 against 82.3, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CDNS returned -3.3% against -25% for UBER. The RyuScore puts CDNS ahead, 60 against 55 out of 100.
| Figure | CDNS | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $353 | $71.38 |
| Market cap | $107B | $146B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 82.3 | 15.6 |
| 1-year return | -3.3% | -25% |
| 5-year return | +114% | +78% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 60/100 | 55/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cadence Design Systems
Revenue of $1.5B in Q1 2026, net income $336M. Its largest reported line is Americas, 51% of the disclosed total.
Uber
Revenue of $14B in Q2 2026, net income $2.4B. Its largest reported line is United States And Canada, 54% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.