CDNS vs UBER
Cadence Design Systems and Uber, both Technology
Uber is the larger company at $146B against $107B. On trailing earnings UBER is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 17.2 against 78.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CDNS returned -7.1% against -12% for UBER. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts UBER ahead, 9/10 against 6/10.
| Figure | CDNS | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $335 | $78.42 |
| Market cap | $107B | $146B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 78.0 | 17.2 |
| 1-year return | -7.1% | -12% |
| 5-year return | +127% | +80% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cadence Design Systems
Revenue of $1.5B in Q1 2026, net income $336M. Its largest reported line is Asia, 40% of the disclosed total.
Uber
Revenue of $14B in Q2 2026, net income $2.4B. Its largest reported line is United States And Canada, 54% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.