CDNS vs DDOG
Cadence Design Systems and Datadog, both Technology
Cadence Design Systems is the larger company at $107B against $79B. On trailing earnings CDNS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 82.3 against 586.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year DDOG returned +114% against -3.3% for CDNS. The RyuScore puts CDNS ahead, 60 against 14 out of 100.
| Figure | CDNS | DDOG |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $353 | $293 |
| Market cap | $107B | $79B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 82.3 | 586.4 |
| 1-year return | -3.3% | +114% |
| 5-year return | +114% | +117% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 60/100 | 14/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cadence Design Systems
Revenue of $1.5B in Q1 2026, net income $336M. Its largest reported line is Americas, 51% of the disclosed total.
Datadog
Revenue of $1.1B in Q2 2026, net income $45M. Its largest reported line is North America, 74% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.