CCI vs LAMR
Crown Castle and Lamar Advertising Company, both Real Estate
Crown Castle is the larger company at $36B against $15B. On trailing earnings LAMR is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 28.1 against 38.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year LAMR returned +28% against -25% for CCI. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts LAMR ahead, 6/10 against 3/10.
| Figure | CCI | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $75.55 | $152 |
| Market cap | $36B | $15B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 38.4 | 28.1 |
| Dividend yield | 6.3% | 4.2% |
| 1-year return | -25% | +28% |
| 5-year return | -50% | +82% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Crown Castle
Revenue of $1.0B in Q2 2026, net income $94M. Its largest reported line is Towers, 92% of the disclosed total.
Lamar Advertising Company
Revenue of $528M in Q1 2026, net income $101M. Its largest reported line is Billboard Advertising, 89% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.